Berkeley
Berkeley’s central arguments for immaterialism
How did Berkeley argue for his striking philosophical position?
Did Berkeley misunderstand Locke’s view of secondary qualities in a way which mattered to his project?
Berkeley's work was in part a reaction to John Locke's Essay concerning Human Understanding. Recent critics have charged that Berkeley misunderstood Locke's positions. Are they correct?
Is Berkeley best understood as a phenomenalist?
Berkeley denied that objects like trees were material substances. Was he an early advocate of the phenomenalist account of what their existence involved?
